Truth On Tate / LaBianca Forums: go for help

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

go for help Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   thinblueline 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 11-September 07

Posted 20 September 2007 - 05:21 PM

why didnt the labianca's go for help or try to escape once charlie went outside to get the rest of them? were they tied back to back or with them not having their feet tied it makes me question why they did not run?
0

#2 User is offline   thinblueline 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 11-September 07

Posted 28 September 2007 - 07:46 AM

good point but with the fear of what happened the night before i would think that as soon as they were tied, they knew it wasn't going to be good. and as soon as the knives came out from the kitchen, and pat and leslie threw the pillow case over her head, i would think that it embedded that thought in her head. didnt pat say the screams of her dying husband would be what rosemary carried into eternity or something like that?
0

#3 User is offline   catscradle77 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 11,121
  • Joined: 19-January 07
  • Locationmy house

Posted 28 September 2007 - 07:54 AM

Yes I think that quote was from when they all were in the TV room and that it was said to Susan or something like that. There are alot of puzzling aspects to the LaBianca case, and I still want to know about the missing piece of carpet, and the Phantom bookmaker that lived up the road from the LaBianca's, that there is little info on except his name being Ed Pierce or something.
0

#4 User is offline   catscradle77 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 11,121
  • Joined: 19-January 07
  • Locationmy house

Posted 04 October 2007 - 05:28 AM

Also, why did Rosemary have that dress on over her nightgown? The whole modesty shy thing, really doesn't make sense in light of the fear of getting robbed or killed. It would be the furthest thing from my mind.
0

#5 Guest_Birds Away_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 January 2008 - 12:37 PM

Stop and think a minute.  This is 1969.  CM probably rang the doorbell.  She was in her nightgown and that was not appropriate so she threw a dress on over it while her husband answered the door.  If CM would have forced his way inside there would have been little chance of him having personal involvement in what took place.  This way he rings the doorbell and everyone stays calm.  He gives them some bs story and is allowed entry.
0

#6 Guest_Birds Away_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:25 AM

Of course, I completely forgot about the time.
0

#7 Guest_Birds Away_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 15 January 2008 - 02:55 PM

He had partied next door, but I thought that was before they moved in.  I am unsure of the chronology here.  It is possible that, if it was after they moved in, they might have known him.  Wasn't there some discussion a while back about "partying" on a couch left out back at this house?
0

#8 User is offline   ThorTate 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 01-December 07

Posted 21 March 2008 - 08:42 PM

Re dress over nighty.
I had never heard this.

The only time my mum would do this was if she had to get out the house quickly,an emergency or such.Maybe she knew they were coming ?

If a woman had time, would  she not remove the nighty before putting a dress on.

Oh my mum also used to put a jacket over her night cloths  if she had to go into the garden quickly to rescue the cat.


Any use ?

Thor




0

#9 User is offline   Birds Away 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 12-February 08
  • Locationoutside looking in.

Posted 22 March 2008 - 07:31 AM

It would almost suggest that the guest was known.  I could see letting a stranger in if you were at gunpoint, but he wouldn't let her put the dress over her nightgown.  She would not put the dress on at the sound of the doorbell because at that hour he husband would more than likely turn anyone away.  Unless is was not an unusual occurence to get late night visitors in that home.  Just brainstorming.
0

#10 User is offline   ThorTate 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 01-December 07

Posted 22 March 2008 - 08:28 AM

Has she been somewhere in her car ?
If she had and it was to get money,would the cops not have spotted this.

Does it look as if she was getting ready to go or had just been ?

Something was going on ?

Thor

Thanks for the help !


0

#11 User is offline   Birds Away 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 12-February 08
  • Locationoutside looking in.

Posted 22 March 2008 - 08:56 AM

The keys were left in her car.  But they did not have automatic tellers like now.  Where would she have gone to get money?  I can't believe she would have been allowed to leave anyway.  There were money and valuables left in plain sight in both locations, why would she be allowed to go retrieve anything?
0

#12 User is offline   coonhound 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: 06-June 10

Posted 21 June 2010 - 08:51 AM

I know this is an old post but as many read/reread these topics I thought of something to add. BirdsAway, great insight about being known and being allowed entrance, or if they normally had visitors at this hour. Would ANYONE open the door at that time of night/morning to a guy who looked like Charlie, EVER, if you didnt know him already? As far as running or screaming for help, have you ever been terrified, I dont mean a little scared from the late late picture show, but petrified? Fear has a way of freezing you up. You dont have the time to sit back and THINK rationally about what you would do, you are in the moment. Scared stiff isnt just a saying, it really does happen.

Also from my classes I took in criminal justice in college....the first thing cops look for are patterns of behavior.

Lottsapoppa/B Crowe-Known to family member(s)
Hinman- known to family
Cielo residents- I believe but cannot prove they knew or had dealings w/ at least one of the men there, definitely knew people who knew people there
Shorty Shea- definitely known to family,
Zero- fringe member of family
death of 2 scientology students- didnt the girl used to date Bruce?
Joel Pugh- connection w/ Sandy
Jane Doe- seen at Spahn by Ruby Pearl knew her to be named Sherry

Even though the last couple are not 100% proven to be the handiwork of the Family, you get the picture

LaBianca's, Random?.....I dont think so, there are reasons that over 90% of murder victims are known to the killer(s)
Too..if you've seen Suzan LaBerge interviews, parole hearings.....if she didnt know Tex why the hell would you go through all the shennanigans to get him out, forgive him, etc?
0

#13 User is offline   Georgiapeach 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 745
  • Joined: 18-April 08

Posted 21 June 2010 - 12:40 PM

Regarding the nightgown--wasn't it said that Charlie told Rosemary to put a dress on over her nightgown? I don't remember where I read this so I don't remember how and why he did it. (if it's true)
0

#14 User is offline   mahlerfan 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 332
  • Joined: 07-May 08
  • LocationChicago, IL

Posted 21 June 2010 - 02:27 PM

View PostGeorgiapeach, on 21 June 2010 - 12:40 PM, said:

Regarding the nightgown--wasn't it said that Charlie told Rosemary to put a dress on over her nightgown? I don't remember where I read this so I don't remember how and why he did it. (if it's true)

Charlie says it himself in the Emmons book. Rosemary was frightened awake by CM and was modestly trying to cover herself. So he told her to put something on over the nightgown.
Mahlerfan
0

#15 User is offline   Bottledbrunette09 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,283
  • Joined: 12-May 09
  • LocationIn a van down by the river

Posted 21 June 2010 - 03:32 PM

I haven't seen the nightgown up close and personal other than it looks pink in the pictures, but perhaps it was a see through nightgown and she was naked underneath, hence being modest about being seen in the nightgown. And coonhound, I do know what its like to be so scared that you can't move. So, yes, I can see how some of the victims didn't try to run for help or for their lives.
A little nonsense now and again is relished by the wisest men.
Anonymous
0

#16 User is offline   mahlerfan 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 332
  • Joined: 07-May 08
  • LocationChicago, IL

Posted 21 June 2010 - 04:04 PM

View PostBottledbrunette09, on 21 June 2010 - 03:32 PM, said:

I haven't seen the nightgown up close and personal other than it looks pink in the pictures, but perhaps it was a see through nightgown and she was naked underneath, hence being modest about being seen in the nightgown. And coonhound, I do know what its like to be so scared that you can't move. So, yes, I can see how some of the victims didn't try to run for help or for their lives.

One can only imagine how vulnerable she must have felt, waking up alone in bed with this creepy stranger in her room. And sick as it sounds to say CM wanted to make his victim feel safe and comfortable the incident does jibe with his "don't let them know you're going to kill them" philosophy for the second night of murder.
Mahlerfan
0

#17 User is offline   greeneyes71 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 47
  • Joined: 18-August 09

Posted 21 June 2010 - 05:56 PM

Given the news story that day, I think I would hesitate before opening the door to a stranger.
0

#18 User is offline   Georgiapeach 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 745
  • Joined: 18-April 08

Posted 21 June 2010 - 06:33 PM

Very true. Of course, they probably figured they lived in a safe neighborhood and "nothing like that could happen here" which is wrong. Something like that could happen anywhere, unfortunately.
0

#19 User is offline   Georgiapeach 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 745
  • Joined: 18-April 08

Posted 21 June 2010 - 06:34 PM

View Postmahlerfan, on 21 June 2010 - 02:27 PM, said:

Charlie says it himself in the Emmons book. Rosemary was frightened awake by CM and was modestly trying to cover herself. So he told her to put something on over the nightgown.
Thanks! I knew I'd read it, but couldn't remember where.
0

#20 User is offline   freebird 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 311
  • Joined: 21-September 09
  • LocationNorthern California

Posted 22 June 2010 - 02:55 AM

View PostBirds Away, on 22 March 2008 - 08:56 AM, said:

The keys were left in her car. But they did not have automatic tellers like now. Where would she have gone to get money? I can't believe she would have been allowed to leave anyway. There were money and valuables left in plain sight in both locations, why would she be allowed to go retrieve anything?



Maybe Rosemary went to collect the contents of the safe at Gateway Mkt. Someone had removed the contents before police arrived. Maybe the black book was in there.

Tin foil hat time. . . . .
"Don't compromise yourself, you are all you've got". ~ Janis Joplin

"Liberty has never come from government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of government power, not the increase of it." ~ Woodrow Wilson

0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users