Truth On Tate / LaBianca Forums: family info

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

family info Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   eviliz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 08-January 10
  • Locationone of the teeny tiny states guess which one

Posted 27 February 2010 - 03:01 PM

    I am currently researching stuff and have a pretty good amount of  RECENT info on family members and some of their children.  the purpose of my research is not for a book but just for my own curiosity and for people like you guys to share it with when it is done.    if anyone else has current photos or info and would like to share or swap with me that would be great!!!!!  i guess i am looking for someone to also not co-author (not sure of what word to use)  but if there is anyone out there with alot of RECENT pics and info maybe we could do something together????        i will not give out real names, addresses or phone numbers though.  i want to respect these peoples privacy as much as possible while doing this.  >:DLiz
0

#2 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:17 AM

Excellent. Maybe we can find out what ever bacame of Sandy and how  her soul sister Lynnette is doing??
0

#3 User is offline   eviliz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 08-January 10
  • Locationone of the teeny tiny states guess which one

Posted 01 March 2010 - 03:47 PM

when i said family i meant the "M" Family, not so much the victims.
0

#4 User is offline   richko62 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 56
  • Joined: 01-October 08
  • LocationWaite Maine

Posted 01 March 2010 - 08:14 PM

You might need to study up on the family a little more if you don't recognize Sandy Good an Lynette Fromme's name.
0

#5 User is offline   eviliz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 08-January 10
  • Locationone of the teeny tiny states guess which one

Posted 02 March 2010 - 10:33 AM

what are you even talking about??
0

#6 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:02 AM

Are you speaking of the Manson Family or the families of the victims? You said the 'M' family so we think that you would know that Sandy and Lynette were major members. Please clarify. Thanks.
0

#7 User is offline   Birds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: 02-December 09
  • LocationMidwest USA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:24 AM

I'm confused.  I didn't see anything in the original post that references any specific member of the family.  How did we spin this into a lack of knowledge on her part?  Did I miss something or is this just a sock puppet reunion?
0

#8 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:31 AM

we didn't spin it. She said that she was refering to the 'M' family and we figured that she would know who Sandy and Lynette were. I'm a bit confused too though.
0

#9 User is offline   Birds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: 02-December 09
  • LocationMidwest USA

Posted 02 March 2010 - 11:33 AM

I am certain she knows well who all the principle players are.
0

#10 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 02 March 2010 - 12:47 PM

ok. We'll see where this thread leads us.
0

#11 User is offline   jempud 

  • Jem
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Resident Duck
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 01-February 07
  • LocationManchester - Buenos Aires - San Martín de los Andes

Posted 02 March 2010 - 04:31 PM

At the risk of stating the blindingly obvious, the thread as posted was a request for people to share pics and info for a personal project that the evil Liz would then share with us all when it was done. She helpfully clarified that she was not so much interested in the victims, more the 'family' around Manson. Note that this post may have been subsequent to Franksta's expression of curiosity as to the fates of Sandy and Lyn, but not necessarily consequent upon it. Asynchronous posting can be a strange and unsettling thing.

All the hijacking of the thread has been done by others, with Liz's only other post being a wholly justified what are you even talking about??.

To say We'll see where this thread leads us is to say 'let's see where the hijackers take it'. But it's not got much to do with Liz or her original request.

Jem






0

#12 User is offline   Birds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: 02-December 09
  • LocationMidwest USA

Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:01 AM

Quote

At the risk of stating the blindingly obvious, the thread as posted was a request for people to share pics and info for a personal project that the evil Liz would then share with us all when it was done. She helpfully clarified that she was not so much interested in the victims, more the 'family' around Manson. Note that this post may have been subsequent to Franksta's expression of curiosity as to the fates of Sandy and Lyn, but not necessarily consequent upon it. Asynchronous posting can be a strange and unsettling thing.

All the hijacking of the thread has been done by others, with Liz's only other post being a wholly justified what are you even talking about??.

To say We'll see where this thread leads us is to say 'let's see where the hijackers take it'. But it's not got much to do with Liz or her original request.

Jem

If the "hijacking the thread" comment refers to me, I apologize.  I was merely trying to defend the original poster who, to my mind, was unfairly attacked.  I will try to refrain from posting off-topic for any reason.
BA

0

#13 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:54 AM

the reaso richko62 said what he did was because the original poster seemed to think that Sandy and Lyn were victim family members. That's why things seemed to go loopy.
0

#14 User is offline   jempud 

  • Jem
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Resident Duck
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 01-February 07
  • LocationManchester - Buenos Aires - San Martín de los Andes

Posted 03 March 2010 - 01:01 PM

Hey, Birds, sorry if you thought I was getting at you. Far from it, post away. Us feathered creatures must support each other.

I just found things a little weird, is all. And I think Franksta's interpretation is spot on.

Peace

Jem
0

#15 User is offline   Birds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: 02-December 09
  • LocationMidwest USA

Posted 03 March 2010 - 01:51 PM

Weird indeed.
Thanks, you always have my support, feathered or otherwise.
BA
0

#16 User is offline   Franksta 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 13-January 10

Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:12 PM

now we need to hear from Eviliz to clarify. Sounds like an interesting endeavor.
0

#17 User is offline   Birds 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: 02-December 09
  • LocationMidwest USA

Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:31 PM

Better to just stop the sniping and nitpicking and move on.
0

#18 User is offline   eviliz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 08-January 10
  • Locationone of the teeny tiny states guess which one

Posted 04 March 2010 - 04:15 PM

geeze didnt think this would cause problems.

lets start again.  someone p.m.ed me asking when i said "family" did i mean Manson family or victim families like Tate, Labianca and so on. i replied to them and then  i posted that is what i meant just in case anyone else was wondering. 

thanks for defending me everyone who did.  i dont like problems or confrontations.  i did find the part about Lyn and Sandy offensive if it was directed at me.  Like o.k. im writing something about Manson and Co yet dont know who Lyn and Sandy are????  wtf.

sorry for creating nonsense  problems.    >:D
0

#19 User is offline   richko62 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 56
  • Joined: 01-October 08
  • LocationWaite Maine

Posted 04 March 2010 - 06:21 PM

I did not intend to ruffle any feathers. I thought you were responding to the previous post. So if it bothered you I,m really sorry but I had know way of knowing you were responding to a PM.
0

#20 User is offline   eviliz 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 08-January 10
  • Locationone of the teeny tiny states guess which one

Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:57 PM

i was not responding to a pm        whatever  not worth my time
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users