COMBINING SUSAN’s LAST THOUGHTS WITH OTHER INFO DEVELOPMENTS PRODUCES ??? THEORY OF EVERYTHING – CM thinks he killed CROWE (Dennis Wilson or crew tip Crowe off where to find TEX) so fearing panther retaliation CM makes to gather drugs ‘n dough and disappear into the desert while ensuring no one is clean enough to nark him off, explains motive for Hinman murder, Shea is killed due to learning about Hinman if Atkins is on the money. Zero over some drug dispute or because he knows too much, Manson does get a tad paranoid at times. The family invests Linda’s 5g or what is left of it in a drug buy to either on-sell to raise more $’s or to split partly for this and part to take to the desert but pivotally gets bad mafia originated product from Voy/Sebring. Manson hears from Cafritz that she and Sharon are at Esalen (MAYBE) and rushes up there to try get some dough off Cafritz, due to this interaction he thinks or he gets told Sharon is not at Cielo house and a drug cargo is arriving there so they should be able to get their investment back... but she can’t give him any dough right now – this gets him shitty so he sends his minions to sort it out with orders to kill if Cielo people don’t make good. Before getting killed Cielo people point a finger at La Bianca's as their suppliers maybe to throw heat temporarily off the actual ones? None of this is meant to come out but Atkins blabs thinking the code of silence she struggles with has her back - wrong - so it all goes to court necessitating murder by the mafia or the family of Leslies lawyer over him doing some real digging (maybe he wanted to call Cafritz to testify), and Cafritz to play dead. Genesis of my thinking below, eclectic sources. (MY NOTATIONS IN CAPS- THE REST IS FROM SUSAN’s LAST BOOK) “M encouraged (young girls) to become dependent on drugs – drugs which he alone would disperse” “Charles Manson had everything. At one time he had almost thirty young girls taking care of him. He hob-nobbed with the Beach Boys and attended Hollywood parties with musicians and movie stars…. Very few people who met Charles Manson during this period weren’t attracted to him.” Hollywood forgave his sexual debauchery with under-age girls. Los Angeles forgave his drug use. The music industry and the counter-culture overlooked his prison time. Charles Manson was finally rejected by society not, as he likes to tell it, because they were cruel and worldly establishment people who didn’t want to “get off his back.” “Gary Hinman, who had donated food and clothing to feed and clothe Manson’s own baby son, was murdered when he wouldn’t give Manson more money.” I don’t speak so much for myself but for the younger kids at the ranch back in 1969. The young runaways who were fed a mouthful of bitterness toward the law and society, and then pulled into auto theft, drug dealing… Once he settled at Spahn’s Ranch, in Los Angeles, Charles Manson’s wants and needs reached even higher. He had men to get him money and drugs and to do his dirty work. If Charles Manson thought Helter Skelter was imminent, and he desperately didn’t want to get caught for the murders, why would he still go ahead and arrange for people to be murdered? He wouldn’t. A STUDY LAST WEEK FOUND 10% THINK THE END IS NIGH …you can imagine what the expenses for drugs were. And for Charles Manson this became a very important consideration. By the summer of 1969, most expenses at Spahn’s Ranch were financed by drug deals and auto theft. All activity around Charles Manson and the men he trusted concerned procuring drugs or money for drugs. Robberies and swindles were performed, sometimes including very dangerous drug burns. And all to obtain more and more money for drugs. By the summer of 1969, Family members were being encouraged to steal from their friends and even burglarize their parents’ homes … Watson (under pressure from M) apparently told Crowe he would sell the drugs to a waiting buyer and then return immediately with the money. (He left a girl as collateral and did not return). Unfortunately the girl had heard Watson call some people earlier and she remembered the phone number. When Watson didn’t come back and Bernard Crowe began pressuring the girl, she called the number she’d seen Watson call and she asked for “Charles.” But Charles Watson was known as “Tex” at Spahn’s Ranch. There was only one “Charles,” and that was Charles Manson. When Manson answered the phone Crowe told him he was a Black Panther (which wasn’t true) and he knew where Manson was and if Manson didn’t come down and give him his money, he and all his Black Panther buddies were going to make a raid at Spahn’s Ranch and kill everyone there.” I FIND IT UNLIKELY THE GIRL REMEMBERED THE NUMBER OR KNEW THAT SPAHN WAS THE PLACE TO FIND THEM JUST THROUGH MAKING A PH CALL! “Though Charles Manson had never even heard of Bernard Crowe it was immediately obvious that (1) Bernard Crowe knew who he was (this was a mistake in identification, but Charles Manson never figured this out), (2) Bernard Crowe knew where Charles Manson lived, and (3) Bernard Crowe was mad.” I’M GUESSING THE TIP OFF RE CHARLES WATSON BEING OF SPAHN CAME FROM DENNIS WILSON OR SOMEONE OF THAT CIRCLE If something happened to Crowe no one would be around to tell the Panthers anything. But either way, it had to be done quick. And so Charles Manson told Bernard Crowe he would meet with him and straighten the whole thing up. The plan was that if Manson wasn’t able to talk his way out of the situation, when they got close enough Manson would signal T. J., who was supposed to pull out the gun and shoot Crowe. Manson was forced to pull the gun himself. He shot Bernard Crowe right in the chest. Crowe fell to the ground and lay still. Later Bernard Crowe told police he’d played dead until Manson left and then got to a hospital. His friends had made sure Manson thought Crowe had been killed… WHAT FRIENDS – WHY WOULD MANSON BE IN TOUCH WITH CROWES FRIENDS - OR ARE WE TALKING DENNIS WILSON? (Atop other problems like the drug hunt he faced) the prospect of retaliation by the Panthers for Crowe’s death…. many of the people in and around Spahn’s Ranch knew he had gone to see Crowe (so he needed to control that risk)… SO THE HELTER SKELTER STORY WAS NOW NOT A RAP TO HOOK DISCIPLES BY MIRRORING THEIR RACE CONCERNS BUT BECOMING MORE OF A EUPHEMISM FOR “WE MUST URGENTLY DEFEND THE RANCH AND MOVE OUT BECAUSE A BUNCH OF BLACKS IS ABOUT TO ATTACK THE RANCH (ACTUALLY JUST ME CM BUT NEVER MIND THAT DETAIL KIDS)” I got to hear what he told the men – and he didn’t waste their time with stories of Helter Skelter. Charles Manson told these men he had just killed a Panther and he needed money to split to the desert and he needed it now! THIS AGREES WITH BOBBY”S CLAIM IN AN INTERVIEW THAT MANSON SAID THEY WERE GOING TO THE DESERT AND SETTING UP A ROCK FESTIVAL …he called a meeting of his top men – he wanted money and he wanted it now!Manson was desperate and getting angry. He was particularly angry with Charles Watson. Manson had done all this for them, he insisted. He had gone to Crowe’s place to protect them – to cover up for Watson’s mistake – now they had to do something to protect him.(Bobby said Hinman had inherited money)… Charles Manson said that Hinman was practically part of the Family (he’d given food for his son and Hinman taught Beausoliel and Manson guitar techniques) – or at least he could be convinced to join. AS A RIVAL LEADER IN THE FAMILY MANSON WANTED TO DEFUSE THE RISK OF BOBBY NARKING ON HIM RE CROWE BY ALSO DIRTYING HIS HANDS SUSAN ELABORATES. WHICH MAY ALSO BE WHY SUSAN WAS CHOSEN TO AID EXTORTION AS SHE KNEW TOO MUCH AS WELL. THOUGH PER BOBBY HINMAN HAD SOLD BAD DRUGS WHICH SHRECK SEEMS TO HAVE POSSIBLY ALSO GOT FROM MANSON –SUGGESTING IF TRUE THAT ATKINS NEEDED HER EAVESDROPPING EAR A HEARING AID. PER SHRECK Doyle sold the bad MDA to Frykowski that Frykowski then sold to Tex Watson and Linda Kasabian, which, in turn, motivated their revenge robbery on August 9, 1969 BUT KARLEEN (SEBRING'S SECRETARY) SAYS IT WAS SEBRING WHO GOT RIPPED DID LINDA KASABIAN’S 5g OR ITS REMAINDER FUND A BUY UP BY TEX?LK VIA FRYKOWSKI OR VIA SEBRING AS A MIDDLE MAN… DID TEX TELL SEBRING THE DRUGS WERE NO GOOD AND REFUND WANTED… IS THIS WHY KARLEEN SAID SEBRING WAS ANGRY RE BEING SOLD BAD DRUGS… DID SEBRING AND VOY CHALLENGE THEIR MAFIA SUPPLIERS OVER BAD PRODUCT? WERE BOTH THE FAMILY AND THE MAFIA MORE THAN A LITTLE PISSED WITH VOY?SEBRING>>> WAS IT A MUTUALLY AGREED HIT GIVEN “SHARON WAS NOT MEANT TO BE THERE” WHAT OF CM’s RECENT STATEMENT TO SHRECK WARNING HIM TO AVOID SHOW BIZ BECAUSE IT”S RUN BY MAFIA WHO BUY YOU AND REMOVE CREATIVE FREEDOM. IF MANSON ALWAYS KNEW MAFIA WAS A BIG PLAYER IN MAKING AND BREAKING STARS WHAT EMBOLDENED HIM TO THREATEN THE LIFE OF DENNIS WILSONS SON? WAS HE A FOOT SOLDIER WHOSE LIFE FINALLY WAS SCRIPTED BY HOLLYWOODS POWER PLAYERS TO MAKE HIM A FALSE MAN OF HS MYTH? HOW WEIRD IS IT THAT DESPITE CM’s FURY AT DENNIS OVER THE SONG REWRITING ON CEASE TO EXIST DENNIS STAYED ON HIS SIDE, ALONG WITH CHARLENE CAFRITZ. DID DENNIS TRY AND TELL CM IT WAS NOT HIS CHOICE TO CHANGE THE WORDS, BUT THE MAFIOSI BOSSES RUNNING THE SHOW?
PS the amount mentioned by Karleen was 2g - maybe 2g worth that he'd on-sold to the family using LK's last few pennies
TooLate, thanks for another great read. Is Susan's last book available as hard copy? I'm not hooked up to a printer and my dial-up connection is cheap, slow and unreliable (drop outs very common). As for witness reliability, I prefer Atkins over Manson via Radio Werewolf. I thought he once said it was the Jews who ran Hollywood/show biz (they certainly built it). Maybe control was a kind of joint effort? I don't think the mob had an influence re Beach Boy lyrics. The band were Capitol Records recording artists, for whom the group made a fortune for in the early-mid '60s. Capitol also had the luxury of the Beatle phenomenon - a license to print more money than a gangster could dream of. Besides Capitol, the main say, financially and artistically, belonged to tyrant father Murry Wilson, and then Mike Love, a very shrewd business person.
Sorry Ambassador I should have linked to Susan's last book, which I heavily quoted from above (as much of it gels to me) in trying to create a theory that fits with other known and missing pieces that have caught my eye - it is only a draft web posted on the site her husband ran for her. http://www.susanatkins.org/03-Stories.html Good info re music biz but I was not suggesting the mafia directed Dennis to change the words of Mansons cease to exist, only that given Manson's fixation on the idea mafia run show biz and his hate of Hollywood that perhaps the missing link was that Dennis told CM he did not change the words because he didn't like the, oh no it was done because... the mafia said so. Poor excuse but one a drug addled mind might feed his... ? highly aggrieved ex lover.
There's always been a very healthy unhealthy relationship between the entertainment world and organised crime. Someone ought to write a book about it ...
TL, the Atkins draft is interesting and it's easy to imagine large chunks of it as being true. But it's also easy to write a story to fit facts that have been known for 35+ years. And I want to point out the page has been edited at some point. When I first discovered that page (2 years ago, maybe?), Atkins mentioned riding to Barker's Ranch with a couple of bikers and I see that information is no longer there. Which leads me to believe the page is just another bit of self-serving fluff Atkins was trying to use to place herself in a more favorable light. Susan Atkins, ever the revisionist. Which kind of proves Cats' theory that even if the murderers did start telling the truth, who would believe them?
Seems to me as if Atkins did her best to lay out both what she knew and made of what she knew, she often stops just short of delivering really interesting stuff, only points people in a direction. I believe this would be as she does not want to pull more people into the pooh or worsen the parole chances of fellow offenders who were looking like surviving her. Even so her text does get quite interesting when lined up against statements made by others over the years. I think it is well worth quite some study. She certainly puts pay to the Helter Skelter nonsense and corroborates things said against HS by others, if unwittingly. I think she could not make a more blatant statement that the killings were over drugs without actually spelling it out, which she carefully avoids doing. I did not read it that way earlier on, but as I've got more knowledge about TLB a re-read after a long interlude changed my take on it.
I'll bite. Here she says the men were given the real low-down. Now if Bobby (per his words in an interview) heard from CM that they were moving there to set up a Rock Festival then that hardly ties in with Helter Skelter and a need to hide in some hole, he was expecting to be in the limelight. Imagine how much drug dealing they could have done had they pulled off a Woodstock not a TLB
Setting up a rock festival in Death Valley sounds like something the 'mastermind' would come up with, doesn't it? I mean, why would he ever want to get the festival located somewhere near a major population center and as close to as many interstate highways as possible? Why not set it up out in the the middle of nowhere, in a God-forsaken place most people wouldn't want to visit on a good day? That way he would have yet another reason to gripe about no one giving him a chance to make it big. If Atkins ever came close to actually telling the truth about Manson and the murders, I suspect this might have been the time. But as mentioned earlier, she once had some information on a couple of bikers on that page and that information has been conveniently removed. Information that could have even cast her in a poor light, not to mention others. And did you notice what was missing? She doesn't play the Jesus card in this draft manuscript. She couldn't write Bill Nelson three sentences without two of them being Scripture and closing the third with a hallelujah, but she could put together (obviously with assistance) this draft manuscript without any of it? See how easily she could turn it on and off? P-h-o-n-y. She was so busy dealing cards from the sympathy deck that she forgot all about Jesus, can you imagine?
Ah, if the Wooly Hophead could today see both the Coachella Festival and the Stagecoach Music event, both that just ended, both near the desert, he would probably lose his mind. These events bring in close to a million people combined, and they are wayyyyy out there. I found SA's last attempt to be quite the interesting read as well. I was looking for signs of her religious conversion or beliefs, and not finding any, immediately felt that she had ridden that horse into the ground, that it was no longer serving the purpose she wanted it to. Her recollection of events were interesting to say the least, an outright lie to say the most. She was very effective in distancing herself, and the girls, from any responsibility other than making bad choices. Well, that and killing people... Her husbands fingerprints are all over this, so I was not expecting anything close to reality.
There used to be a musical happening of some sort just past Ocotillo Wells almost every weekend during the summer months back in the day. We used to go and stay all night, do and whatever then leave at dawn before the real heat kicked in. The desert is beautiful under a full moon. FB
I'd think there was no point in adding Hallelujah every two sentences, the 'book' was concerned only with laying out the background. Writing to Nelson and other ghouls she probably laid the religion on thick as a device to discourage ghouls and to try and ensure the company she was keeping was the type she preferred - other religious folk, who do often use such lingo. The removal of the biker stuff is very interesting, I've seen mention she was bonking DeCarlo which if true opens up a whole can of worms re the drug angle, yes? Dilligaffe notes that; "Her husbands fingerprints are all over this" but at least he notes this is more-so for early chapters, and it is to be expected that they collaborated since they were mutual supports and he was her lawyer as well. A good lawyer would have removed anything that was jeopardising of Susan's or other offenders Parole chances before putting it on the net... or was that not it and was he instead motivated by a friendly reminder to stop his Lady from chin wagging, courtesy of the bikers or DDeC, just lately?
From reading the bit about Hinman's death and Beausoleil's rivalry with Manson, it strikes me that Manson, holding the upper hand, knew damned well that BB would make a mess of things and therefore encouraged him by whatever subliminal ways he had to bump off Hinman. Figuring that BB would make such a balls up of it, which he did, with help from CM's machete, it wouldn't be long before BB was caught. Once BB split from Spahn and was on the road to Frisco, could it be CM tipped off the cops: after all, it was unusual that the cops checked out a parked car on spec. Did they know what they were looking for???
They were stopping because a car was stopped on a State Highway in an area that is posted no stopping. This happens dozens of times a day in California. It gave them probable cause to investigate further.
Anything is possible, but I hold this at arm's length. Manson really has ever done one thing well in his life. He has maintained secrecy about crimes he and others he knew were involved in. Othat than that, Manson is the kind of guy to get arrested at 3:00 AM in Resume Speed, Montana for jaywalking, and end up doing 10 years federal time for the offense. But he has never offered up anyone, since his arrest. Yes, he's made some vague comment about the Frenchman, but never once had Manson offered authorities any real information about Beausoleil, Watson, Krenwinkel, Atkins, Van Houten, Davis, Grogan, or any of the other Manson followers who were accused/convicted of murder. Manson was street-smart, but he was also extremely prison-smart. I just don't see him trying to set Beausoleil up for a murder. Because if a 21 year-old Beausoleil ever got caught up in some tough interrogation, he just might slip up, or thinking he could cut himself a deal, open up about Manson and what Manson had going on at Spahn Ranch. In the words of Benjamin Franklin, "Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead." Manson might have figured it would be good for Beausoeil to wet his steel, but I would think only as long as Beausoleil remained within Manson's sphere of influence. And, in spite of all the talk about how people couldn't leave, Beausoleil was one of the in-and-out (go easy Cali residents, I didn't say, "In-N-Out") Manson followers, so he was known for leaving quite a bit. Once again, if Manson hand-picked Beausoleil to commit that murder, he couldn't have made a much worse selection. One theory holds the Cieo murders were to come up with $600, so Manson could get Brunner out of jail. Note it wasn't to get both Brunner and Good bailed out, just Brunner. Maybe Manson was trying to get Brunner away from the police before she started talking about what happened at Hinman's? Maybe this was a way of throwing Beausoleil a bone, to keep him quiet about Manson's other 'activities'? Because I just can't imagine Manson running any risks on Beausoleil ratting him out.
As I said in an earlier post, Mike, the voice of sanity. Good points, I concede to your ration rationale
No need to concede anything, as I was just speculating and offering my own opinion on the matter. And my opinion is no more valid than your own.
Might well have been, but then so much easier not to have carried out slaughter at Cielo and Waverley, not to have bothered about relocating to Death Valley etc etc etc ... The Family never did anything the easy way ... they were crap. Crap at being good, crap at being bad ...
And have Share, Lutesinger and Van Houten getting upset about it? It comes back to that concept of three people being able to keep a secret, if two are already dead.