Riddle Me This

Discussion in 'What's Your Theory' started by Mike, Mar 25, 2012.

  1. SurelyYouJest New Member

    Mike, re why not go on, well, I haven't read all the pages, just the 1st page, but some here claim to have done their fair share of drugs. So, malnourished, on speed, the adrenaline pumps up, then the speed wears off, the adrenaline drops off, they are hungry, and so they simply don't have the energy for more. It ain't sexy, but if you've ever witnessed the physical and mental crash when the speed wears off...
  2. SurelyYouJest New Member

    Mike could think of better publicity? Sure, the court appointed rate doesn't pay that well, but you can't beat the free advertising, and what, nine months worth?
  3. Mike Well-Known Member

    I considered that angle. But we're talking about attorneys who had already developed considerable portfolios. How would the free advertising work in Shibley's case, for instance? It's not as if he was struggling to make a name for himself. And he was visiting Manson at Terminal Island, in 1967. Manson hadn't built his own name at that time, so what would Shibley have had to gain?
  4. freebird Donating Members

    Is the person who pays the attorney considered a client along with the defendant and, does that fall under attorney / client privilege?
  5. Dilligaf Donating Members

    The client is the person whose interests counsel is representing, not the person paying the bill. Should the third party be present during protected discussions, one can argue that the veil has been pierced, thus protection no longer exists ragarding that discussion.
  6. freebird Donating Members

    Thank you, Dill. I don't suppose it is public record who was paying those two to represent Wastson.
  7. Dilligaf Donating Members

    No, it is not typically public record.

Share This Page