Gerry Armstrong's Preface (PLEASE READ FIRST)

Discussion in 'Scientology' started by Coroner In Law, Jan 20, 2009.

  1. Coroner In Law New Member

    Gerry Armstrong's Preface (please read first)


                              Foreword by
                            Gerry Armstrong


    This is my contribution to the celebrations and protests on the occasion of
    the birthday of L. Ron Hubbard in 2000.

    Not all that long ago, someone sent me a copy of the set of writings which
    follow, written by L. Ron Hubbard in or about 1947. The original of these
    writings was in Hubbard's personal archive which I assembled and worked
    with in 1980 and 1981. I provided the writings to Omar Garrison, a wog
    writer with whom $cientology had contracted to write Hubbard's "authorized
    biography." In 1984 I read portions of them into the record at my trial in
    $cientology v. Armstrong, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. C 420153.
    The trial resulted in the widely cited decision by Judge Paul G.
    Breckenridge, Jr. wherein he described Hubbard as a "pathological liar."


    Omar first called these writings Hubbard's "Affirmations." Later, after it
    dawned on him that Hubbard was a stupendous liar, Omar said he was
    correcting himself, and thereafter called the writings the "Admissions." I
    believe that Omar was right, and that these writings are "Affirmations,"
    but more importantly, "Admissions."

    I will not now provide anything really of my own analysis or conclusions
    about Hubbard's Admissions, because I want every $cientologist or wog who
    reads them to be free, or with negligible influence, to think about them
    for himself. I will comment below, for legal reasons, on *why* I am posting
    the Admissions. I have my own experiences, naturally, with these writings,
    I have drawn my own conclusions about them, and I expect I will participate
    in a discussion or two they may generate.

    I don't know who in this recent period sent me the copy from which I typed
    that follows. In any event I would not divulge the identity of the person
    because of the clear and senseless threat of attack from the people who now
    run $cientology. It is sufficient for legal purposes to state that the copy
    I received was not made by me. By the time the Admissions are posted to the
    internet, I will have, pursuant to the wishes of the person who made it,
    destroyed the copy I received.

    I will also immediately wipe the Admissions from my hard drive. Thus the
    people who run $cientology will have less reason or justification to raid
    me or break into my house or computer than they have to raid or break into
    the house or computer of a million other people.

    The Admissions I received are not complete. Perhaps when the kind person
    who sent me the copy sees they have been posted he will send the rest of
    the writings. My recollection is that the remainder of the Admissions do
    not diverge from the substance, direction or tone of what I'm posting here.
    Included in the remainder is, I think, a deeper delve into Hubbard's sexual
    anxieties or aberrations, following the same vein he mined in the part I
    received. What I received, for example, doesn't include Hubbard's startling
    admission, "It doesn't give me displeasure to hear of a virgin being raped.
    The lot of women is to be fornicated."

    I am posting the Admissions for all of the reasons stated in my declaration
    of January 26, 1997, specifically in paragraphs 57 - 65, which I recently
    posted to a.r.s.:

    From: Gerry Armstrong <gerry@gerryarmstrong.org>
    Subject: Making Light of Black PR, Part 2, January 26, 1997 Armstrong
    Declaration for RTC v. Ward. Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 08:12:59 GMT
    Message-ID: <38c3687e.235039734@news.dowco.com>

    In that declaration I provided my expert opinion that the exposing or
    dissemination of $cientology's "sacred scriptures," which exposure or
    dissemination the organization prohibits, suppresses and punishes by
    commercial, secular copyright and trademark law and millions upon millions
    of simoleons to lawyer scumbags, is justified by the greater principle of
    religious freedom. I stated that publication of $cientology's "secret
    scriptures" is in my opinion Constitutionally protected religious
    expression.

    Hubbard's Admissions are quite obviously a part of $cientology's
    "scriptures. On the holiness scale , they are holier than the holiest of
    the Advanced Technology scriptures, because the people who run $cientology
    won't show them to $cientologists even if they have a half million dollars
    to pay and agree to the organization implant. Although the Admissions are
    the holiest of $cientology's scriptures, the Miscavige regime withholds
    them for the identical commercial, secular, base and criminal reasons they
    withhold the "OT" "Levels," the "NOT$," and the whereabouts of Xenu's
    mountain cave.

    $cientology has set no prerequisites or punishments that I'm aware of for
    $cientologists reading Hubbard's Admissions, and for that at least I'm
    grateful. I believe that the Admissions should be read by every
    $cientologist at whatever point they find themselves on the bridge.
    $cientologists won't get pneumonia. They might have some good cognitions.
    They might become free.

    The Admissions were very important to me in my getting free of the web of
    lies Hubbard and $cientology had spun, and getting free of their domination
    and suppression. I am posting these writings now with the prayer that they
    help to free other $cientologists from Hubbard's and Miscavige's lies,
    domination and suppression. If Hubbard has been humbled and regained his
    willfully lost humanity, I know he too would want every $cientologist to
    read all his Admissions.

    Obviously I don't have any desire to profit monetarily by posting Hubbard's
    unpublished Admissions. My desire is that these writings help everyone,
    $cientologist and wog , to make informed and better choices about L. Ron
    Hubbard and $cientology. I was not freed by being a $cientologist, doing
    $cientology, and having all the experiences, cognitions and trappings of
    $cientology. I was freed by reading what $cientologists don't get to read,
    by being what no $cientologist would be, a wog , by doing what no
    $cientologist would do, and having my own experiences, cognitions and
    stuff. I share Hubbard's Admissions with everyone because God Who created
    knowledge does not want anyone to be kept ignorant.

    I stated in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration that the people $cientology
    identified as violating the organization's copyrights and sued - Grady
    Ward, Lawrence Wollersheim, Keith Henson, Dennis Erlich, Arnie Lerma, Bob
    Penny -- were in general agreement that $cientology is not a sincere, and
    hence real, religion, but is a criminal cult engaged in harmful practices.
    I also stated that if these people are correct in their assessment, and if
    they did expose or publish $cientology's "secret" documents, they were and
    are completely justified in having done so.

    Repeating what I wrote in the Jan 26, 1997 declaration, "In my opinion this
    kind of expression is an expected, logical response to Scientology's
    efforts to corrupt the meaning of religion in order to "sanctify" its
    antisocial and dangerous mind set and criminal activities. It is expression
    which cannot legally be prohibited or punished by judicial process." I
    agree completely that $cientology, that is, $cientology as directed by
    David Miscavige and his regime, is not a sincere, real religion, but a
    criminal cult engaged in harmful practices.

    I could, quite clearly, have posted the Admissions anonymously. I gave it
    serious consideration, because while I believe these writings, for the
    peace and health and spirit of so many people, should be posted
    immediately, I wanted to do what be effective and not the stupid end of
    martyrdom. I decided against anonymity, however, for a number of reasons. I
    believe that by U.$., Canadian and international law, and common sense, I
    am permitted to publish these writings openly. I believe that by common
    decency, by human and civil rights codes, by being a Prophet to
    $cientologists (Pt$), and by God Himself, I am urged, in fact directed, to
    post these writings and post them openly.

    I am also posting the Admissions openly to confirm their authenticity. The
    copy I received was not clear in places, and it is now gone. All words,
    spellings, punctuation and notations are Hubbard's, except for brackets []
    which are mine. I pray that DM makes the complete original of the
    Admissions available for $cientologists around the world. Indeed I pray
    that he reveals every hidden piece of Hubbard's writings, and yes, even his
    own secret documents, to all $cientologists and interested wogs . Robert
    Vaughn Young and Stacy Brooks at least have read the Admissions and will be
    able to confirm that what follows here is, within reasonable parameters,
    authentic. I was very careful, but if there are any errors at all in what I
    have posted of the Hubbard Admissions, I urge DM to have them corrected.

    Posting the Admissions, I believe, lessens the threat of harm or murder to
    silence me, but it ups the revenge factor . The person who sent me the
    copy emphatically doesn't want any trouble. Good Lord, I don't want any
    trouble, and I'm the guy who typed this copy and will now post it using my
    own name to a.r.s. The person who sent the copy certainly knew that I would
    recognize the writings and I'd like to think wanted me to do with them what
    I've done and what the person was in no position to do. I have not shown
    what I'm posting to anyone, but I will now email it to certain people when
    I post it.

    I am aware that DM will almost certainly attack me. To justify his and
    $cientology's continuing attack, as Hubbard did for his continuing attacks
    while he lived, they made attack their organizational policy of choice, or
    scripture of choice I suppose I should say. Nevertheless, perhaps this is a
    good time for Miscavige to learn that non-attack is the best policy.

    I really think the $cientologists would be silly to sue me. Then again I've
    thought they're silly for years and years and that hasn't deterred them.
    But perhaps in this instance they can learn to not do another silly thing.
    I'm giving $cientology and $cientologists another golden opportunity to
    stop being silly. It's God actually Who gives everyone opportunities to
    stop being silly. I'm but a simple messenger, with staggering inabilities,
    and at times admittedly silly. Miscavige's $cientology is willfully silly.
    Suppression is no accident, it is willful. I am but a prophet who brings
    $cientologists opportunities to be healed of their willfulness, silliness
    and suppression.

    I am aware that the posting of the Admissions makes a godsent legal test
    case. If I am guided by God, what I have done not being unsafe or immoral,
    my post is protected expression because it cannot be denied. Without
    including God, it is clear that $cientology, $cientologists and their
    agents (for there are wogs who are $cientology's agents) are themselves
    responsible for my actions. What they have done to silence me, to 8-C my
    body from place to place, to invalidate me, to black PR me, to threaten me,
    to destroy me, has either been a source of my state of mind, and hence my
    actions, or God has. (I think it can be agreed that the mind directs
    actions, rather than actions directing the mind.)

    If God is directing my actions, how could I do anything else? If DM and his
    $cientology organization have affected my mind, they bear responsibility
    for the act about which they might complain. In truth both things are true.
    God is in control, and DM and $cientology have unclean hands. It is
    observable throughout history that God sends prophets, and even the
    unprophetable, to deal with tyrants and regimes whose hands are unclean.

    A case can be made that my posting Hubbard's Admissions is a fair and
    appropriate response to DM's dissemination and internet posting of my
    writing known as the "pig dream." Obviously I held the copyright to that
    unpublished work. The pig dream was a glimpse in an extremely literary form
    into the mind of Gerry Armstrong. The Admissions are a glimpse in a
    different literary form into the mind of L. Ron Hubbard.

    I certainly don't argue that Hubbard's Admissions are no more important or
    vital than my pig dream. There is, after all, nobody paying huge sums of
    money and spending their lives working for Armstrongology. On the other
    hand, Hubbard's dead. DM had his agents post the pig dream to hurt me. I'm
    posting Hubbard's Admissions to set $cientologists free. I'll copyright my
    portion of this post, and hereby give my permission for it to be copied and
    distributed.

    For fair use purposes, the context for the post containing theAdmissions is
    the global controversy about Hubbard, about $cientology's antecedents,
    about Hubbard's psyche, his honesty or dishonesty, his mental technology,
    "Excalibur," his promises, his aims, his history, his theology, his
    hypnotism, his navy record, his non-navy record, and other clearly
    controversial Hubbard-connected conumdrums. The context is the controversy
    we see every day on a.r.s. and in media around the world.

    The period when Hubbard made these Admissions involved John W. Parsons,
    Sara Northrup, his family, magick, his "development" of "Dianetics" leading
    to the publication of the book that would make him famous and lead on to
    $cientology. Funnily, Hubbard and $cientology claim that he was a "Special
    Officer" for the LAPD in this period and that he was working for the U$
    Navy to break up the Parsons "black magic ring." There is a VA record
    showing that around the time of the Admissions Hubbard sought psychiatric
    help.

    Just one last thought, which I'll repeat from my Jan 26, 1997 declaration,
    and which I pray that DM and his $cientologists take to heart. Although man
    may attempt to keep God out of his other realms, he surely cannot keep God
    out of religion, because in this world it is His Realm. That's sort of the
    message every prophet brings.

    I hope Hubbard's Admissions are a blessing and a help to all.

    2000 Gerry Armstrong

Share This Page